Fertility in UK - Revision history

Vipul: /* References */

2014-03-11T17:37:48Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 11 March 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:
	* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility] (a portal for papers on how public policy relates to fertility by the Institute of Fiscal Studies in the UK)		* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility] (a portal for papers on how public policy relates to fertility by the Institute of Fiscal Studies in the UK)
	* [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/birth-summary-tables--england-and-wales/2011--final-/sty-fertility.html Why has the fertility rate risen over the last decade in England and Wales?]		* [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/birth-summary-tables--england-and-wales/2011--final-/sty-fertility.html Why has the fertility rate risen over the last decade in England and Wales?]
			* [http://populationmatters.org/documents/family_sizes.pdf Socio-demographic comparison between those UK families with up to two children and those with three or more] by Susanne Whiting.

Vipul: /* References */

2014-03-11T17:33:03Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 11 March 2014
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}		* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}
	* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility] (a portal for papers on how public policy relates to fertility by the Institute of Fiscal Studies in the UK)		* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility] (a portal for papers on how public policy relates to fertility by the Institute of Fiscal Studies in the UK)
			* [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/birth-summary-tables--england-and-wales/2011--final-/sty-fertility.html Why has the fertility rate risen over the last decade in England and Wales?]

Vipul: /* References */

2014-03-11T17:31:57Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 11 March 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	* {{paperlink\|comparative fertility policy analysis}}		* {{paperlink\|comparative fertility policy analysis}}
	* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}		* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}
	* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility]		* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility] (a portal for papers on how public policy relates to fertility by the Institute of Fiscal Studies in the UK)

Vipul: /* References */

2014-03-11T17:31:20Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 11 March 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	* {{paperlink\|comparative fertility policy analysis}}		* {{paperlink\|comparative fertility policy analysis}}
	* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}		* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}
			* [http://www.ifs.org.uk/projects/201 Public policy and fertility]

Vipul: /* Completed fertility */

2014-03-11T17:25:41Z

Completed fertility

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 11 March 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	{{#lst:cohort fertility in UK\|summary}}		{{#lst:cohort fertility in UK\|summary}}

			==References==

			* {{paperlink\|comparative fertility policy analysis}}
			* {{paperlink\|welfare-family-fertility-Europe}}

Vipul: /* Period fertility */

2014-03-10T00:05:43Z

Period fertility

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Period fertility==
-===Total indicators only without breakdown by birth order===
+{{further|[[period fertility in UK]]}}
-{| class="sortable" border="1"
+{{#lst:period fertility in UK|summary}}
 ==Completed fertility==

Vipul: /* Cohort fertility */

2014-03-09T23:57:22Z

Cohort fertility

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 9 March 2014
Line 107:		Line 107:
	\|}		\|}

	==~~Cohort~~ fertility==		==Completed fertility==

			{{further\|[[completed fertility in UK]]}}

	{{#lst:cohort fertility in UK\|summary}}		{{#lst:cohort fertility in UK\|summary}}

Vipul at 23:38, 9 March 2014

2014-03-09T23:38:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 9 March 2014
Line 106:		Line 106:
	! <math>R^2</math> for linear regression \|\| 0.0857362041 \|\| 0.0776628224 \|\| 0.0004014848 \|\| 0.29395424 \|\| 0.0201133068 \|\| 0.268278503		! <math>R^2</math> for linear regression \|\| 0.0857362041 \|\| 0.0776628224 \|\| 0.0004014848 \|\| 0.29395424 \|\| 0.0201133068 \|\| 0.268278503
	\|}		\|}

			==Cohort fertility==

			{{#lst:cohort fertility in UK\|summary}}

Vipul at 01:55, 9 March 2014

2014-03-09T01:55:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 9 March 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	{{HFD source\|country = UK\|country code = GBR_NP\|update date = June 25, 2013\|download date = February 26, 2014}}		{{HFD source\|country = UK\|country code = GBR_NP\|update date = June 25, 2013\|download date = February 26, 2014}}

	==~~Data on period~~ fertility==		==Period fertility==

	===Total indicators only without breakdown by birth order===		===Total indicators only without breakdown by birth order===

Vipul at 06:30, 27 February 2014

2014-02-27T06:30:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 27 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	information type = fertility\|		information type = fertility\|
	country = UK}}		country = UK}}

			==Data sources==

			{{HFD source\|country = UK\|country code = GBR_NP\|update date = June 25, 2013\|download date = February 26, 2014}}

			==Data on period fertility==

			===Total indicators only without breakdown by birth order===

			{\| class="sortable" border="1"
			! Year \|\| [[Crude birth rate]] (CBR) (births per 1000 people) \|\| CBR minus previous year's CBR \|\| [[Total fertility rate]] (TFR) (sum of all [[age-specific fertility rate]]s) ballpark for [[replacement fertility]] is 2.1 \|\| TFR minus previous year's TFR \|\| TFR40 \|\| TFR40 minus previous year's TFR40
			\|-
			\| 1974 \|\| 13.1 \|\| \|\| 1.914 \|\| \|\| 1.883 \|\|
			\|-
			\| 1975 \|\| 12.4 \|\| -0.7 \|\| 1.805 \|\| -0.109 \|\| 1.777 \|\| -0.106
			\|-
			\| 1976 \|\| 12.01 \|\| -0.39 \|\| 1.739 \|\| -0.066 \|\| 1.714 \|\| -0.063
			\|-
			\| 1977 \|\| 11.69 \|\| -0.32 \|\| 1.683 \|\| -0.056 \|\| 1.659 \|\| -0.055
			\|-
			\| 1978 \|\| 12.22 \|\| 0.53 \|\| 1.75 \|\| 0.067 \|\| 1.727 \|\| 0.068
			\|-
			\| 1979 \|\| 13.06 \|\| 0.84 \|\| 1.86 \|\| 0.11 \|\| 1.836 \|\| 0.109
			\|-
			\| 1980 \|\| 13.38 \|\| 0.32 \|\| 1.894 \|\| 0.034 \|\| 1.87 \|\| 0.034
			\|-
			\| 1981 \|\| 12.97 \|\| -0.41 \|\| 1.823 \|\| -0.071 \|\| 1.798 \|\| -0.072
			\|-
			\| 1982 \|\| 12.77 \|\| -0.2 \|\| 1.779 \|\| -0.044 \|\| 1.755 \|\| -0.043
			\|-
			\| 1983 \|\| 12.81 \|\| 0.04 \|\| 1.768 \|\| -0.011 \|\| 1.744 \|\| -0.011
			\|-
			\| 1984 \|\| 12.93 \|\| 0.12 \|\| 1.766 \|\| -0.002 \|\| 1.742 \|\| -0.002
			\|-
			\| 1985 \|\| 13.28 \|\| 0.35 \|\| 1.793 \|\| 0.027 \|\| 1.768 \|\| 0.026
			\|-
			\| 1986 \|\| 13.32 \|\| 0.04 \|\| 1.78 \|\| -0.013 \|\| 1.756 \|\| -0.012
			\|-
			\| 1987 \|\| 13.66 \|\| 0.34 \|\| 1.811 \|\| 0.031 \|\| 1.786 \|\| 0.03
			\|-
			\| 1988 \|\| 13.83 \|\| 0.17 \|\| 1.824 \|\| 0.013 \|\| 1.799 \|\| 0.013
			\|-
			\| 1989 \|\| 13.62 \|\| -0.21 \|\| 1.791 \|\| -0.033 \|\| 1.766 \|\| -0.033
			\|-
			\| 1990 \|\| 13.95 \|\| 0.33 \|\| 1.834 \|\| 0.043 \|\| 1.807 \|\| 0.041
			\|-
			\| 1991 \|\| 13.8 \|\| -0.15 \|\| 1.818 \|\| -0.016 \|\| 1.79 \|\| -0.017
			\|-
			\| 1992 \|\| 13.56 \|\| -0.24 \|\| 1.795 \|\| -0.023 \|\| 1.765 \|\| -0.025
			\|-
			\| 1993 \|\| 13.2 \|\| -0.36 \|\| 1.758 \|\| -0.037 \|\| 1.727 \|\| -0.038
			\|-
			\| 1994 \|\| 12.97 \|\| -0.23 \|\| 1.74 \|\| -0.018 \|\| 1.708 \|\| -0.019
			\|-
			\| 1995 \|\| 12.62 \|\| -0.35 \|\| 1.709 \|\| -0.031 \|\| 1.676 \|\| -0.032
			\|-
			\| 1996 \|\| 12.61 \|\| -0.01 \|\| 1.727 \|\| 0.018 \|\| 1.692 \|\| 0.016
			\|-
			\| 1997 \|\| 12.46 \|\| -0.15 \|\| 1.725 \|\| -0.002 \|\| 1.688 \|\| -0.004
			\|-
			\| 1998 \|\| 12.26 \|\| -0.2 \|\| 1.714 \|\| -0.011 \|\| 1.676 \|\| -0.012
			\|-
			\| 1999 \|\| 11.94 \|\| -0.32 \|\| 1.685 \|\| -0.029 \|\| 1.646 \|\| -0.03
			\|-
			\| 2000 \|\| 11.54 \|\| -0.4 \|\| 1.642 \|\| -0.043 \|\| 1.602 \|\| -0.044
			\|-
			\| 2001 \|\| 11.32 \|\| -0.22 \|\| 1.627 \|\| -0.015 \|\| 1.585 \|\| -0.017
			\|-
			\| 2002 \|\| 11.27 \|\| -0.05 \|\| 1.634 \|\| 0.007 \|\| 1.59 \|\| 0.005
			\|-
			\| 2003 \|\| 11.67 \|\| 0.4 \|\| 1.705 \|\| 0.071 \|\| 1.658 \|\| 0.068
			\|-
			\| 2004 \|\| 11.94 \|\| 0.27 \|\| 1.755 \|\| 0.05 \|\| 1.705 \|\| 0.047
			\|-
			\| 2005 \|\| 11.97 \|\| 0.03 \|\| 1.765 \|\| 0.01 \|\| 1.712 \|\| 0.007
			\|-
			\| 2006 \|\| 12.31 \|\| 0.34 \|\| 1.82 \|\| 0.055 \|\| 1.764 \|\| 0.052
			\|-
			\| 2007 \|\| 12.6 \|\| 0.29 \|\| 1.869 \|\| 0.049 \|\| 1.81 \|\| 0.046
			\|-
			\| 2008 \|\| 12.86 \|\| 0.26 \|\| 1.915 \|\| 0.046 \|\| 1.853 \|\| 0.043
			\|-
			\| 2009 \|\| 12.7 \|\| -0.16 \|\| 1.897 \|\| -0.018 \|\| 1.833 \|\| -0.02
			\|-
			\| 2010 \|\| 12.87 \|\| 0.17 \|\| 1.927 \|\| 0.03 \|\| 1.861 \|\| 0.028
			\|-
			\| 2011 \|\| 12.8 \|\| -0.07 \|\| 1.923 \|\| -0.004 \|\| 1.853 \|\| -0.008
			\|-
			! Maximum \|\| 13.95 \|\| 0.84 \|\| 1.927 \|\| 0.11 \|\| 1.883 \|\| 0.109
			\|-
			! Minimum \|\| 11.27 \|\| -0.7 \|\| 1.627 \|\| -0.109 \|\| 1.585 \|\| -0.106
			\|-
			! Average \|\| 12.6913157895 \|\| -0.0081081081 \|\| 1.7832631579 \|\| 0.0002432432 \|\| 1.7468684211 \|\| -0.0008108108
			\|-
			! Median \|\| 12.785 \|\| -0.05 \|\| 1.7795 \|\| -0.004 \|\| 1.7555 \|\| -0.008
			\|-
			! Standard deviation \|\| 0.7136778403 \|\| 0.3248148005 \|\| 0.0804718128 \|\| 0.0448636238 \|\| 0.0777936185 \|\| 0.0440301903
			\|-
			! Slope for best linear fit (using linear regression) \|\| -0.0188040267 \|\| 0.0023304884 \|\| 0.0001450925 \|\| 0.0012183499 \|\| -0.0009927782 \|\| 0.0010912755
			\|-
			! Multiplier for best logarithmic fit (using linear regression on logarithm) \|\| 0.9985079181 \|\| \|\| 1.0000366522 \|\| \|\| 0.999401821 \|\|
			\|-
			! <math>R^2</math> for linear regression \|\| 0.0857362041 \|\| 0.0776628224 \|\| 0.0004014848 \|\| 0.29395424 \|\| 0.0201133068 \|\| 0.268278503
			\|}