Fertility in Singapore: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{country-specific information|information type = fertility|country = Singapore}} | {{country-specific information|information type = fertility|country = Singapore}} | ||
==Data sources== | |||
[[Human Fertility Database]] data is not available for Singapore. We therefore rely on the United Nations data as compiled by Gapminder. | |||
==Qualitative history of fertility-relevant events and trends== | |||
===Key events=== | |||
The event history here is based on the discussion of Singapore in Jonathan Last's book ''What to Expect When No One's Expecting''. | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Year !! Event !! Postulated effects seen in fertility statistics | |||
|- | |||
| 1966 || The government of Singapore established a "Family Planning and Population Board" which used a combination of persuasive and coercive tactics. The government launched a propaganda campaign with emphasis on the importance of the [[two-child ideal]]. || | |||
|- | |||
| 1983 || The government switched to a pro-natalist policy, providing tax breaks to highly educated women who had three or more children, while giving cash incentives to women with low levels of education who refrained from having more than two children. || | |||
|- | |||
| 1986 || The government initiated a "New Population Policy" encouraging ''everybody'' to have more children. The "Two is Enough" messages were replaced by messages of the "Have Three or More Children If You Can" form. || | |||
|- | |||
| 2000 || The government announced "Baby Bonus" programs as well as "Child Development Accounts" that provided government-matched long-term savings for kids. || | |||
|} | |||
==Data on period fertility== | ==Data on period fertility== | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 27 February 2014
This page gives information of type fertility about the country Singapore.
See all pages giving information on fertility for particular countries|See all pages giving information about Singapore
Data sources
Human Fertility Database data is not available for Singapore. We therefore rely on the United Nations data as compiled by Gapminder.
Qualitative history of fertility-relevant events and trends
Key events
The event history here is based on the discussion of Singapore in Jonathan Last's book What to Expect When No One's Expecting.
| Year | Event | Postulated effects seen in fertility statistics |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | The government of Singapore established a "Family Planning and Population Board" which used a combination of persuasive and coercive tactics. The government launched a propaganda campaign with emphasis on the importance of the two-child ideal. | |
| 1983 | The government switched to a pro-natalist policy, providing tax breaks to highly educated women who had three or more children, while giving cash incentives to women with low levels of education who refrained from having more than two children. | |
| 1986 | The government initiated a "New Population Policy" encouraging everybody to have more children. The "Two is Enough" messages were replaced by messages of the "Have Three or More Children If You Can" form. | |
| 2000 | The government announced "Baby Bonus" programs as well as "Child Development Accounts" that provided government-matched long-term savings for kids. |
Data on period fertility
The data below is UN data as used by Gapminder.
| Year | Total fertility rate (TFR) estimate |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 5.16595125 |
| 1888 | 5.73120345 |
| 1903 | 5.4557564 |
| 1908 | 5.37651885 |
| 1913 | 5.39830256 |
| 1918 | 5.62247585 |
| 1923 | 5.8856217 |
| 1928 | 6.46294663 |
| 1933 | 7.1934885 |
| 1938 | 7.6759488 |
| 1943 | 5.7249155 |
| 1948 | 6.60352 |
| 1950 | 6.487 |
| 1951 | 6.538 |
| 1952 | 6.62 |
| 1953 | 6.661 |
| 1954 | 6.661 |
| 1955 | 6.62 |
| 1956 | 6.538 |
| 1957 | 6.415 |
| 1958 | 6.254 |
| 1959 | 6.055 |
| 1960 | 5.821 |
| 1961 | 5.557 |
| 1962 | 5.27 |
| 1963 | 4.967 |
| 1964 | 4.658 |
| 1965 | 4.356 |
| 1966 | 4.074 |
| 1967 | 3.815 |
| 1968 | 3.582 |
| 1969 | 3.375 |
| 1970 | 3.19 |
| 1971 | 3.014 |
| 1972 | 2.836 |
| 1973 | 2.652 |
| 1974 | 2.461 |
| 1975 | 2.272 |
| 1976 | 2.096 |
| 1977 | 1.945 |
| 1978 | 1.827 |
| 1979 | 1.743 |
| 1980 | 1.82 |
| 1981 | 1.78 |
| 1982 | 1.74 |
| 1983 | 1.61 |
| 1984 | 1.62 |
| 1985 | 1.61 |
| 1986 | 1.43 |
| 1987 | 1.62 |
| 1988 | 1.96 |
| 1989 | 1.75 |
| 1990 | 1.83 |
| 1991 | 1.73 |
| 1992 | 1.72 |
| 1993 | 1.74 |
| 1994 | 1.71 |
| 1995 | 1.67 |
| 1996 | 1.66 |
| 1997 | 1.61 |
| 1998 | 1.48 |
| 1999 | 1.47 |
| 2000 | 1.6 |
| 2001 | 1.41 |
| 2002 | 1.37 |
| 2003 | 1.27 |
| 2004 | 1.26 |
| 2005 | 1.26 |
| 2006 | 1.28 |
| 2007 | 1.29 |
| 2008 | 1.28 |
| 2009 | 1.257 |
| 2010 | 1.261 |
| 2011 | 1.267 |
| 2012 | 1.275 |